A classic argument for protecting freedom of speech as a fundamental right is that it is essential for the discovery of truth. This
argument is particularly associated with the British philosopher John Stuart Mill. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote that "the best
test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground
upon which their wishes safely can be carried out."
Freedom of speech is the concept of being able to speak freely without censorship.
It is often regarded as an integral concept in modern liberal democracies. The right of freedom of speech is guaranteed under international
law through numerous human rights instruments, notably under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10
of the European Convention on Human Rights, although implementation remains lacking in many countries. The synonomous term freedom
of expression is sometimes preferred, since the right is not confined to verbal speech but it is understood to protect any act of
seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
In practice, the right to freedom of speech
is not absolute in any country, although the degree of freedom varies greatly. Industrialized countries also have varying approaches
to balance freedom with order. For instance, the United States First Amendment theoretically grants absolute freedom, placing the
burden upon the state to demonstrate when (if) a limitation of this freedom is necessary. In almost all liberal democracies, it is
generally recognized that restrictions should be the exception and free expression the rule; nevertheless, compliance with this principle
is often lacking.